It only talks about the possibility of depletion of agriculture as a result of worsening climatic conditions and soil erosion, in turn caused by deforestation. Statement 2 is incorrect because the passage does not mention anything about the availability of land for the common man in general. Let us have a look at the options given.Statement 1 is correct because the passage mentions that unless afforestation of denuded areas is not taken up, the harsh climatic conditions and soil erosion by wind and water will increase to a great extent. We are asked to identify the consequences of deforestation and denudation. It warns that unless deforestation is reversed by measures like afforestation, the harshness of climate and erosion of soil will aggravate to such an extent that the staple occupation of agriculture would become impossible in the long run. The passage talks about the problem of deforestation and its impact on climate and soil. Refer to the line: “Some developed countries have begun to alleviate the worst effects by expanding recycling…” According to the passage, expanding recycling has in fact helped reduce unsustainability. Expansion of recycling does not lead to unsustainability in production pattern. It clearly shows that access to resources is a major determinant in ensuring sustainable production. Refer to the line: “But most developing countries are affected by the high costs and low availability of clean energy sources.” Developing countries have limited access to resources. Refer to the line: “Current production models rely heavily on fossil fuels.” There is a clear indication towards reducing the reliance on fossil fuels to ensure sustainable development. In this context the author has touched upon different reasons leading to unsustainability in the production process. The passage focuses on unsustainability of production and consumption patterns.
0 kommentar(er)
